DB

RSP 12936

Registrant: Zamir Punja

General Information

Sample Name
DB - roots from flowering plant
Accession Date
September 27, 2023
Reported Plant Sex
Female
Microbiome
Krona Plot
Fungal Microbiome
Krona Plot
Bacterial Microbiome
Krona Plot
Viral Microbiome
Krona Plot

This visualization shows how genetically distinctive this strain is compared to every other cultivar in the Kannapedia database. Distinctiveness is measured from the phylogenetic tree using the Fair-Proportion Evolutionary Distinctiveness index: it sums the unique branch length this strain "owns", so a cultivar sitting alone on a long branch scores high (rare), while one buried in a dense cluster of near-identical strains scores low (common). The curve is the distribution of that score across all cultivars, and the marker shows where this strain falls — so you can see, as a single percentile, how unique it is rather than just how far it is from its nearest match.

Rarity: Common

More genetically distinct than 430 of 1502 cultivars (29th percentile).

The thermometer gauge shows where this strain falls in the range of heterozygosity levels for cannabis cultivars in the Kannapedia database — cooler toward the low (less heterozygous) end, warmer toward the high end, with a tick marking the population average. The marker shows this particular strain, and the caption gives its percentile; strains in the extreme tails are flagged "unusually high" or "unusually low." Heterozygosity is associated with heterosis (aka hybrid vigor) but also leads to the production of more variable offspring. When plants have two genetically different parents, heterozygosity levels will be higher than if it has been inbred or backcrossed repeatedly.

Heterozygosity: 1.28%
Interactive 3D Cannabis Atlas See DB in the tree of life Spin, zoom, and explore exactly where DB sits among its closest genetic relatives. Launch 3D tree

Genetic Information

About this report

This report identifies predicted high-impact variants in selected cannabis genes based on DNA sequence. For most genes, the report shows the count of such variants and how often they appear in our database. For the cannabinoid synthases THCAS, CBDAS, and CBCAS, the report additionally calls Bt/Bd allele type — whether the gene copy is intact or deleted. Apart from these synthase deletion calls, this report does not measure protein function, gene expression, copy number, or zygosity. Variant effects are predictions, and the gene-level interpretive notes describe what is known about the gene — not specific phenotypic predictions for this plant.

Cannabinoid Production

Plant Type Type I THCAS Intact CBDAS Deleted CBCAS Intact

Terminal Cannabinoid Synthases

The final enzymes that convert CBGA into THCA, CBDA, or CBCA. Bt/Bd allele typing for these genes provides a direct readout of which terminal synthase copies are intact, which usually corresponds to a known chemotype designation.

THCAS encodes tetrahydrocannabinolic acid synthase, the terminal enzyme that produces THCA from CBGA. THCAS and CBDAS compete for the same substrate, so the relative status of each shapes the THC:CBD ratio.

What this means

This report calls Bt/Bd allele type for THCAS — whether the gene copy is intact or deleted. A deleted THCAS allele is associated with hemp-type chemotypes; an intact allele is associated with the capacity for THC production. Predicted high-impact variants are reported separately and indicate sequence-level changes whose functional consequence depends on factors this report does not measure.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Bt/Bd allele type
Intact
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected

CBDAS encodes cannabidiolic acid synthase, the terminal enzyme that produces CBDA from CBGA. It is the defining enzyme for CBD-dominant chemotypes.

What this means

This report calls Bt/Bd allele type for CBDAS. An intact CBDAS allele is associated with the capacity for CBD production; a deleted allele is associated with chemotypes lacking CBD. Combined with THCAS allele status, this directly informs the chemotype class.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Bt/Bd allele type
Deleted
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected

CBCAS produces cannabichromenic acid (CBCA) from CBGA. CBC is a minor cannabinoid in most strains but accumulates as a major component in some chemotypes.

What this means

This report calls Bt/Bd allele type for CBCAS. The relationship between CBCAS allele status and CBC accumulation is less commonly the dominant driver of overall chemotype than THCAS or CBDAS status, but is informative for minor cannabinoid profiles.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Bt/Bd allele type
Intact
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected

Core Biosynthesis

Enzymes that build CBGA, the universal cannabinoid precursor. Several of these genes are present as paralogous copies, and the functional impact of a variant in one copy depends in part on the status of the others.

Olivetolic acid cyclase (OAC) works with the polyketide synthases to produce olivetolic acid, a key intermediate that is then prenylated to form CBGA. OAC activity is required for the canonical cannabinoid biosynthesis pathway.

What this means

Cannabis carries two OAC paralogs (OAC-1 and OAC-2). The functional consequence of predicted high-impact variants in one copy depends on the status of the other and on tissue-specific expression patterns, neither of which this report measures.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
OAC family
  • OAC-2 No variants

Paralog of OAC-1, also encoding olivetolic acid cyclase. Both copies are presumed to contribute to olivetolic acid production.

What this means

As with OAC-1, the impact of predicted high-impact variants in this copy depends in part on the status of the other paralog. The aggregate paralog summary at the category level is generally more informative than any single OAC gene's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
OAC family
  • OAC-1 No variants

Aromatic prenyltransferase 1 (also called CBGAS) catalyzes the prenylation step that produces CBGA — the universal precursor to all major cannabinoids. This is a key step in cannabinoid biosynthesis.

What this means

aPT1 is part of a small gene family with aPT4 nearby in the genome. Whether predicted high-impact variants in aPT1 affect total cannabinoid output depends on the status of aPT4 and on expression patterns this report does not measure.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
aPT family
  • aPT4 No variants

Closely related paralog of aPT1, located nearby in the genome. May contribute to CBGA production or have a related prenyltransferase role.

What this means

Variants here may be partly buffered by aPT1 if both retain function. The aggregate paralog summary at the category level is more informative than this single gene's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
aPT family
  • aPT1 No variants

PKSG-family polyketide synthase that condenses hexanoyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA to produce the polyketide intermediate that OAC cyclizes. One of multiple closely related PKSG copies in the cannabis genome.

What this means

Cannabis carries at least four PKSG copies (PKSG-2a, 2b, 4a, 4b). The aggregate status across all four is more informative than any single copy's variant count, and is summarized at the category level.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
PKSG family
  • PKSG-2b No variants
  • PKSG-4a No variants
  • PKSG-4b No variants

Paralog of PKSG-2a, with closely related function. The PKSG family in cannabis includes multiple closely linked copies with overlapping roles.

What this means

As with PKSG-2a, the aggregate status across the four PKSG copies is more informative than any single gene's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
PKSG family
  • PKSG-2a No variants
  • PKSG-4a No variants
  • PKSG-4b No variants

Member of the PKSG4 subgroup of polyketide synthases. Functions in producing the polyketide intermediate for cannabinoid biosynthesis.

What this means

Aggregate status across the PKSG copies is more informative than this single gene's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
PKSG family
  • PKSG-2a No variants
  • PKSG-2b No variants
  • PKSG-4b No variants

Paralog of PKSG-4a. Together with PKSG-2a, 2b, and 4a, forms a small gene family of closely related polyketide synthases.

What this means

Aggregate status across the PKSG copies is more informative than this single gene's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
PKSG family
  • PKSG-2a No variants
  • PKSG-2b No variants
  • PKSG-4a No variants

Polyketide & Acyl Metabolism

Enzymes that supply and activate the polyketide precursors used in cannabinoid biosynthesis. Some members of these gene families are cannabinoid-specific in cannabis; others have broader metabolic roles inferred from related plants.

PKSA-family polyketide synthase. In well-studied plants, members of this family produce polyketide compounds beyond the cannabinoid pathway, including chalcones and stilbenes. The cannabis-specific role of PKSA paralogs is less directly defined than for PKSG.

What this means

Effects of variants here are harder to anchor than for the dedicated cannabinoid PKSGs, in part because the cannabis-specific function is less directly characterized.

Evidence
Inferred from homology
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
PKSA family
  • PKSA-3b No variants

Paralog of PKSA-3a. Type III polyketide synthases in plants typically have broader metabolic roles than the cannabinoid-specific PKSGs.

What this means

As with PKSA-3a, the cannabis-specific role is less directly defined than for PKSG. Paralog redundancy may buffer effects of variants in a single copy, though this report does not measure expression of either copy.

Evidence
Inferred from homology
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
PKSA family
  • PKSA-3a No variants

PKSB-family polyketide synthase. Like PKSA, this family typically functions in broader polyketide metabolism in well-studied plants. The cannabis-specific role is not as directly established as for PKSG.

What this means

Variants here may relate to a wider range of secondary metabolites beyond cannabinoids; the specific cannabis function is not directly characterized.

Evidence
Inferred from homology
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected

AAE1 activates hexanoic acid into hexanoyl-CoA, the starter substrate that polyketide synthases extend to produce olivetolic acid. AAE1 has been characterized in cannabis as part of the cannabinoid biosynthesis pathway.

What this means

Cannabis carries three AAE1 paralogs. The aggregate status across all three is more informative than any single copy's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
AAE1 family
  • AAE1-2 No variants
  • AAE1-3 3 variants · 27.1%

Paralog of AAE1-1. The three AAE1 copies in cannabis may have overlapping or partially specialized roles in acyl-CoA activation.

What this means

Aggregate status across the AAE1 copies is more informative than this single gene's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
AAE1 family
  • AAE1-1 No variants
  • AAE1-3 3 variants · 27.1%

Third paralog of AAE1. The presence of three copies suggests gene family expansion, possibly with sub-functionalization across tissues or substrates.

What this means

Aggregate status across the AAE1 copies is more informative than this single gene's variant count.

Evidence
Well-characterized in cannabis
Predicted high-impact variants
None detected
Population frequency
27.1%
AAE1 family
  • AAE1-1 No variants
  • AAE1-2 No variants

Sequence Data Downloads

Sequence data files (FASTQ, BAM, VCF, and assemblies) are available to the registered holder of this report. If you are the holder, log in to download. Otherwise, please contact us.

Microbiome Analysis

14,294,912 total reads
40.1% reads classified
80.6% host plant DNA
1383 samples in database

Read Classification

80.6% Cannabis sativa (host plant) 19.4% other organisms

40.1% of 14,294,912 total reads were classified · compared against 1383 samples

Organisms of Cannabis Relevance

Fungal Pathogens

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus fumigatus LOW 98.5 RPM med. 0.0
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0
Aspergillus terreus
Aspergillus terreus ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea ND 0.7 RPM med. 0.2
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum LOW 47.5 RPM med. 7.2
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0
Powdery Mildew
Powdery Mildew ND 0.8 RPM med. 1.2
Phytophthora cinnamomi
Phytophthora cinnamomi ND 2.9 RPM med. 0.0
Pythium ultimum
Pythium ultimum ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0

Regulated Pathogens

Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica MED 146.1 RPM med. 0.9
E. coli (STEC)
E. coli (STEC) LOW 23.0 RPM med. 1.2
Listeria monocytogenes
Listeria monocytogenes ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MED 332.2 RPM med. 0.0

Beneficial Organisms

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis ND 0.0 RPM med. 0.0
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum PRESENT 2.9 RPM med. 0.5
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida PRESENT 79.4 RPM med. 0.0
Streptomyces griseus
Streptomyces griseus PRESENT 2.0 RPM med. 0.0
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis PRESENT 0.6 RPM med. 1.4
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense PRESENT 15.8 RPM med. 0.0
Nitrosomonas europaea
Nitrosomonas europaea PRESENT 3.7 RPM med. 0.0

Most Abundant Microbes

Top organisms detected (bacteria, fungi, archaea, viruses — excluding host plant DNA), compared to 1383 samples in the database.

Bacteria
Pseudoxanthomonas mexicana Bacteria 99th %ile
7,851.9 RPM avg 74.1
Bacteria
Aeromonas salmonicida Bacteria 100th %ile
4,636.4 RPM avg 6.0
Bacteria
Rhizobium sp. 16-488-2b Bacteria 84th %ile
1,661.7 RPM avg 43.2
Bacteria
Pseudoxanthomonas japonensis Bacteria 93rd %ile
1,496.5 RPM avg 36.2
Bacteria
Shinella zoogloeoides Bacteria 99th %ile
1,346.0 RPM avg 31.9 ◆ med 1.3
Bacteria
Shinella oryzae Bacteria 98th %ile
1,304.9 RPM avg 10.8
Bacteria
Hydrogenophaga sp. YM1 Bacteria 97th %ile
1,278.6 RPM avg 15.2
Bacteria
Sphingopyxis sp. DBS4 Bacteria 97th %ile
1,253.7 RPM avg 18.7
Bacteria
Sphingopyxis terrae Bacteria 99th %ile
1,220.6 RPM avg 10.5
Viruses
Stenotrophomonas phage vB Sm QDWS359 Viruses 97th %ile
1,215.7 RPM avg 2.8
Bacteria
Thermomonas brevis Bacteria 97th %ile
1,204.0 RPM avg 17.5
Bacteria
Pokkaliibacter plantistimulans Bacteria 93rd %ile
876.9 RPM avg 34.2
Bacteria
Sphingopyxis macrogoltabida Bacteria 98th %ile
812.5 RPM avg 10.2
Bacteria
Paradevosia tibetensis Bacteria 99th %ile
737.0 RPM avg 7.5
Bacteria
Pseudomonas citronellolis Bacteria 91st %ile
605.9 RPM avg 60.6
This sample Average (1383 samples) ◆ Median

Autoflower & Early Flowering Markers

Autoflower1
Unresolved
13.2% of WGS database (n=774)
Early1
Wild-type
24.2% of WGS database
Markers scored
0 / 3
AUTO-1, -2, -3 primary loci
CNV at locus
2 events detected
CNV-INTERGENIC · CNV-DEL-GENE

Database Comparison

774 WGS samples in the Kannapedia database with Autoflower marker data

Autoflower1 distribution
This sample: Unresolved  · 13.2% of the database (102 of 774 samples)
Early1 distribution
This sample: Wild-type  · 24.2% of the database (187 of 774 samples)

Marker Genotypes

Marker JL Position Genotype Depth Alt / Ref Confidence In database
Autoflower1
AUTO-1 contig865:262,132 No call gap 0 / 0 Gap
48% share this GT
AUTO-2 contig856:6,252,387 No call 0 / 2 No call
11% share this GT
AUTO-3 contig856:6,470,166 No call 0 / 5 No call
10% share this GT
AUTO-4 contig856:6,707,384 WT / WT 6 / 0 Low
36% share this GT
AUTO-5 contig856:5,758,585 No call 0 / 2 No call
40% share this GT
Early1
EARLY-1 contig246:3,472,589 WT / WT 0 / 7 High
85% share this GT
EARLY-2 contig246:3,482,588 No call 0 / 0 No call
12% share this GT

Copy-Number at Locus

Region Candidate gene Est. CN Log₂R Windows Tier
AUTO-1 region 0.70 -1.511 4 Low
AUTO-2 / NFYB8 NFYB8 1.15 -0.792 12 (3 NA) Low
AUTO-3 / RAP2-7 RAP2-7 1.58 -0.340 7 (1 NA) Typical
AUTO-4 / PRR73 PRR73 0.99 -1.012 8 (2 NA) Low
AUTO-5 region 1.39 -0.524 12 (21 NA) Typical
EARLY / RDR3 RDR3 0.73 -1.450 15 (3 NA) Low
Paralog block (contig504) 2.42 0.277 496 (383 NA) Typical
Paralog block (contig856) 1.88 -0.090 632 (328 NA) Typical

Interpretation

Autoflower1 · AF-UNRESOLVED Autoflower1 status could not be determined. Too few markers returned a confident call to issue a verdict (see marker table). Re-sequencing at higher depth, or genotyping the missing markers directly, is needed before this locus can inform breeding decisions.
Early1 · E1-HOM-WT Wild-type at Early1. Does not carry the early-flowering allele; flowering date at this locus will follow the line's normal photoperiod response (and Autoflower1 dosage, if any).
Marker note · AUTO-1 Coverage gap at this marker position — adequate reads are present in the extracted window but none span the marker base. This may reflect a deletion, insertion, or other structural variant overlapping the marker site. No SNP call is possible; inspect the alignment directly.
Marker note · AUTO-2, AUTO-3, AUTO-5, EARLY-2 Insufficient read depth to genotype this marker in this sample. No call made. The verdict above is based on the remaining markers; see the concordance count for how many were available.
Copy-number · CNV-INTERGENIC A copy-number variant overlaps the locus but does not touch a named candidate gene. Likely not directly causative, but record it — it can still interfere with marker genotyping if it overlaps a marker position.
Copy-number · CNV-DEL-GENE Deletion overlapping a candidate gene at the locus. Loss of a flowering-time gene is a strong structural candidate for a phenotypic effect — if anything, more informative than a SNP at the same position. Flag for direct inspection; if phenotype data are available, this sample is a priority for association testing.
Method note. These calls are derived from whole-genome variant and copy-number data, not from a validated PACE assay. The Autoflower1 and Early1 diagnostic SNPs are not covered by the CannSNP90 or SS3 genotyping chips, so any chip-genotyped sample relies on linked proxy variants and carries wider uncertainty. Per-marker confidence reflects read depth and mapping quality at each marker position. Use this report to prioritise and plan — not as a substitute for phenotypic confirmation.

Marker panel and loci: Toth JA, Stack GM, Carlson CH, Smart LB (2022). Identification and mapping of major-effect flowering time loci Autoflower1 and Early1 in Cannabis sativa L. Front. Plant Sci. 13:991680. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.991680

Sex Determination & Monoecy

XX Female — Typical

Sex Determination Locus — Copy Number Analysis

Copy number across the three candidate sex-determination genes and the upstream transposable element insertion site. The pink curve shows the distribution among WGS females (n=694); the dimmed curve shows the other sex for reference. Percentiles are sex-matched.

Note: X chromosome coverage is lower than typical for this sample (CN 1.43). Copy number calls at individual loci should be interpreted with caution.

This sample carries two copies of the X chromosome (CN 1.43), consistent with an XX female or monoecious genotype. The sex-determination locus shows diploid copy number across all three candidate regulatory genes: CsREM16 (CN 1.22) and CsKAN4 (CN 1.03). According to Toscani et al. (2026), CsREM16 is strongly expressed in female tissue across all developmental stages examined and has no Y chromosome counterpart, consistent with its proposed role as a key regulator of female identity. CsKAN4, a KANADI family transcription factor also absent from the Y chromosome, shows higher expression in dioecious females than in monoecious individuals. The upstream regulatory region where a transposable element insertion has been identified in monoecious cultivars shows typical diploid copy number (CN 0.20) in this sample, suggesting no structural disruption at this locus.

These findings are based on whole genome sequencing copy number variant analysis and reflect structural genomic features only. Copy number variation does not directly measure gene expression. Phenotypic interpretation requires additional experimental validation. The biological framework referenced here (Toscani et al., New Phytologist, 2026, doi: 10.1111/nph.71185) represents current research and the proposed sex-determination model has not yet been functionally validated through mutant studies in cannabis. These findings concern inherited monoecy and do not predict stress-induced hermaphroditism (light-leak, photoperiod, or heat-stress herming), which is environmental rather than genetic.

ACS Monoecy Marker

Two linked in-frame indels in exon 4 of the ACS gene (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase), an enzyme in the ethylene biosynthesis pathway, proposed by Carey et al. (2026) as a candidate X-linked sex-determination marker. The variant haplotype is associated with the monoecious ("hermie") phenotype as a recessive trait. This ACS marker and the CsREM16/CsKAN4 locus above are two independent candidate explanations for X-linked sex determination — both published in 2026 — not two parts of one mechanism. They agree the switch is X-driven with no active Y, but propose different genes as the trigger.

3-bp Insertion
no call
c.1338_1340dup
in-frame
discordant
3-bp Deletion
hom-ref
c.1320_1322del
in-frame

One exon-4 marker was genotyped successfully while the other returned a no-call. Because the two INDELs are normally inherited together, the called marker offers a provisional read on the locus — but the genotype should be treated as tentative until the second position is confirmed.

These markers are based on Carey, S.B., Bentz, P.C., Lovell, J.T. et al. "An X-linked sex determination mechanism in cannabis and hop," Nature Communications (2026), doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-73233-7, which proposes ACS as a candidate sex-determination gene in cannabis. They are research-grade indicators associated with the monoecious ("hermie") phenotype and are not a validated diagnostic of plant sex, which is also influenced by environment and other genetic loci. This describes inherited (genetic) monoecy only — it does not predict stress-induced hermaphroditism. Herming triggered by light leaks, interrupted dark periods, or heat stress in a genetically stable female is environmental and is not captured by genotype, so a reference result here does not guarantee a plant will not herm under stress.

Read Pileup — ACS Exon 4

contig887:2,354,269–2,354,325 (57 bp). Orange markers indicate the two indel sites. Click to expand.

ACS Exon 4 — contig887:2,354,269–2,354,325

Chemical Information

Cannabinoid and terpenoid information provided by the registrant.

Cannabinoids

No information provided.

Terpenoids

No information provided.

Blockchain Registration Information

Transaction ID
2dc469e58d7825264844dc24324cf41af0d07075e8562e60af1f7ca99dd1efa8
Stamping Certificate
Download PDF (39.5 KB)
SHASUM Hash
79c7b2cb90779596a66a1a969384360a517890e8ef174af86288ff4b3de2eec1

Kannapedia uses cookies

By clicking Allow All, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Customize Settings